Way back before I found WordPress and before I even knew what a blog aggregator was, I started writing on the Internet. Whether or not I’m actually any good at it, I’ve always fashioned myself as a writer. Some thirty years ago, my high school creative writing teacher said “you have a beautiful gift, never stop writing.”
Somehow I got sidetracked and never parlayed that into a career. Then along came the Internet and I had a forum. I did a lot of writing on the old Themestream site before they went belly up, and actually had a couple of articles picked up by World Net Daily. I wrote and published my own ebook based on my 8 years as an event planner in DC. Last year I managed to participate in and complete the Nanowrimo challenge, writing a 50,000 word novel in the month of November 2005. It’s still in serious need of editing, but I did it.
So, when a friend turned me on to WordPress which gave me the ability to post daily on my own domain, I jumped at the chance. Another friend introduced me to the Virginia Blognet News and the Virginia Political Blogs around July. The rest, as they say, is history.
The Allen/Webb campaign was both a fascinating and frightening experience.  I’ve known and supported George Allen for over 20 years. So, when I say I know that “macaca” was a made up story, a stupid story, I know what I’m talking about. Macaca has been debated ad nauseum, but the reality is that even the honest ones on the left know that George Allen is not a racist. It was a blunder and an opportunity for the left to win. They did. And for a good portion of that the Allen campaign helped them. Let’s face it, Jim Webb didn’t win. George Allen lost.
I would have handled macaca in an entirely different manner. I knew it was a stupid story. If I had been in charge (and why the heck am I not anyway?) I would have 1) issued an immediate apology to Siddarth, 2) noted that in a press release and 3) shut up and never talked about it again.
Instead we got about four different explanations from the campaign and for some reason that still baffles me, they sent the Senator on an apology tour.
The other thing I would have handled differently was the campaign Internet presence. Why in heaven’s name did we not have an official campaign blog before macaca? Jon Henke did an admirable job, along with the A-Team and even the B-Team. But it was too little, too late. Interestingly, I made similar suggestions to the Kilgore campaign. I even volunteered to lead part of that effort.
Instead though, what we got from Kilgore was Hitler. What we got from the Allen campaign was that Webb hates women and writes about pedophilia.
In my attempt to be a good partisan and a loyal campaign follower, I ran with those. With gusto. But I let my closest friends with the campaign know I felt pretty smarmy in doing so.
In retrospect, I think we ran with that stuff late in the game because that was all we had. And that’s a matter of poor opposition research.  Senator Allen’s post campaign remarks were correct. If we had stayed on the issues, he would have won reelection.
But that’s history. It’s painful history but I still pray that we learn from it.
Unfortunately with this latest Goode/Grievous/Waldo brouhaha, I’m convinced that most of my friends on the right haven’t learned quite enough just yet.
I’m not going to review the whole chronology of what transpired. Waldo gives a pretty good rundown of what started things with: Should I shut down the aggregator.
Waldo says:
Last night I removed a blog for the first time. This site, run by an anonymous blogger, sought to support Rep. Virgil Goode in his attack on Rep. Ellison. To do so, the blogger posted an extremely graphic photo of an American beheaded by his terrorist captors in Iraq. I worked hard to avoid seeing these images at the time of the beheadings, because I found the act so disgusting that I simply did not want to witness them. (Many will recall the anger displayed by many conservatives that these images were even available to Americans, saying that “the terrorists have already won if we see them,†that the press was un-American for displaying them, etc.) I found it upsetting and angering to see that image appear smack-dab in the middle of the aggregator. Terrorists circulated the photo of this man for political gain; now this blogger had done the same. It wasn’t clear to me what I should do, but when the deluge of complaints began I knew that there was only one response: remove the site.
A few days later Waldo announces: The aggregator is dead. Long live the aggregator.
Virginia Political Blogs is no more. In its place is a new website, Waldo’s Virginia Political Blogroll. It’s simply an expanded version of the blogroll on the sidebar of this blog (at right), which lists 170 political blogs around Virginia. I explain on my blogroll site that it’s my blogroll and, as such, nobody is about to tell me what I can and can’t link to.
The “offending” blogger was of course, General Grievous Dog. GCD has been dedicated to posting photoshopped images. Some funny. Some not so funny. But, it was, and still is, pretty creative work.
Over the course of the last two weeks I was spending most of my blogging time with my advent posts and working on a couple of other blogs that I run. So I didn’t actively follow the controversy over the letter.
Around the same time, I was invited to join the ranks of the Old Dominion Blog Alliance. I was honored by that invitation and accepted gladly.
I immediately found myself at odds with some of my fellow alliance members. My statement to them was that, while I understood the sentiment behind Congressman Goode’s remarks, his words were, at best, poorly chosen. The reality is that Congressman-elect Ellison is perfectly within his rights to hold the Koran while he is taking his oath of office.
Heck folks, we all should have learned that in U.S. Government 101.
I may not like it. I may not approve of it. But if I am to understand and support the U.S. Constitution, I have to believe that is his right. It doesn’t matter if I think the followers of the Koran are horribly misguided.
Yes folks, I know that there is a huge contigency of Muslims around the world that want to see us wiped off the face of the earth. And yes, I know Ellison is a follower of Louis Farrakhan.
There’s still nothing in our law that prevents him from holding the Koran while he takes the Oath of Office.
And what was with linking Ellison to illegal immigration? I still don’t follow that connection.
Anyway, I never saw this as a winning issue for our side. So, in an email I cautioned that it was best to let it drop. I was not alone in that admonition. But I was apparently ignored. Fact is, if we had let it drop before Christmas, today everyone would be talking about President Ford’s funeral, Saddam Hussein’s final hours and college football.Â
I sent that out on December 23. The offending pictures were posted somewhere around the same time.
I was busy wrapping packages and preparing for 24 people to descend on the Smythe household on Christmas Day. I signed on long enough to publish my final advent posts. I followed some of the conversation but figured it would soon blow over.
Then I find out that Waldo had booted General Grievous Dog from Virginia Political Blogs. I followed up and saw the pictures.
I don’t blame Waldo for not wanting that on his site. He ran the site. He was/is our host. It’s his house.
Now, having said that, there’s no question that Waldo revealed his political bias by removing GCD.
But it’s his house.
Personally, even though I agreed that Congressman Goode’s remarks were inappropriate, I think there were a lot of other options for fighting on his behalf. We all know those images exist. Most of us have already seen them. I certainly wouldn’t want them on my site.
GCD is perfectly within his right to post them. But he also has to be willing to accept the consequences.
When I signed up for Waldo’s aggregator, I don’t remember any promises that it was a free for all. There’s a lot of stuff on there that offends me. But I choose to fight back in a different matter. I post, I mock, I counterattack. I love a good snark. Throughout the campaign I encouraged my fellow Republicans to post early and often. And I complained, and acknowledged that we were still being beaten the blogosphere.
What Republicans have to learn is how to be better at using the Internet. We ain’t there yet.
But back to Waldo. In one email someone said “Waldo has gone over the edge.” My response was that I think Waldo was pushed over the edge.
So, to quote Shaun: I disagree with the man’s politics, but I think Waldo is a fine individual who doesn’t deserve many of the personal insults he’s had to endure.
So here it goes:
Chad briefly came out of retirement to ask:Â Can we disagree without being disagreeable?
Jason followed up with I thought Waldo liked dogs?
Now to my reasoning for asking that I be removed from the ranks of the Old Dominion Blog Alliance.
Looking around a couple of days ago, I found that SWACgirl had posted a list of blogs that had come to the Dog’s defense. The Ward View was on the list.
I posted a comment and noted that I had not publicly commented over the matter either pro or con.Â
SWACgirl did remove my blog from the list and posted an explanation. But not before she said: In the words of President George W. Bush, “You’re either with us or against us.”
Really, she’s going to question my patriotism over a silly Internet squabble?
It gets better.
Somewhere along the line the Dog was outed by The Richmond Democrat.Â
Republican Blogger is a FraudÂ
…a member of the Old Dominion Blog Alliance–and for the past few days he has been passing himself off as a graduate of the George Mason University School of Law, issuing legal opinions, and making threats in Virginia’s blogosphere.
Trouble is that he’s really a 19-year-old in the valley. And, as of yesterday it appears that he is alledgedly the young man who “took a dive” at one of Mike Starks’s attempted assaults on Senator Allen.
Let me be clear. I post under a pen name. But I don’t lie about my credentials. Using my real name would be a conflict with my day job. It’s not that my employer doesn’t know where I stand, much to the contrary. But the appearance of my given name in multiple daily posts just wouldn’t be prudent. It wouldn’t take a great deal of investigative reporting to figure out who I am. I’d just hope you would do me the courtesy of not publishing it. Still, my world won’t end if you do.
That said, when the story broke about the Dog, the indignation rose again in the emails.Â
My question back was “well, is it true?”
Apparently it is and apparently I struck a nerve. My integrity was called into question because I use a pen name (please find where I’ve ever pretended to be an attorney). Someone even said “for all we know, you might be Waldo.”
Well, thanks. I just ain’t that cute.
Combine that with the Dog’s call that we need to have a “serious discussion” about whether or not anyone who remains on Waldo’s blogroll being allowed to remain in the ODBA.
Pardon me Pup, but you’ve already lost your credibility to call for a serious discussion. Do you not see the irony of calling for censorship because you’re offended that Waldo has engaged in censorship?
Spank that Donkey says Conservatives should stick together.
Well, I agree, but this just isn’t the hill I’m willing to die on.
STD says: The Blogs, SWAC Girl, Elle, the Journal of the Common Man, and GGD have something in common….. They are all related to grass roots volunteer work on Republican Campaigns going back to 1990’s.
Well kudos to you for your grassroots efforts, but that doesn’t mean you always get it right. And as for going back to the 1990’s, well I got my start in grassroots politics campaigning for Barry Goldwater. I was six years old. And my parents voted for Johnson.
STD continues:Â One day you might need us peasants who fight for principles, and not titles and such, we fight to survive.
For what it’s worth, I have no Republican titles, official or otherwise. Shoot, I sent my special membership card and secret decoder ring back to the RNC so many times I got booted from The White House Christmas card list.
But let me be clear, I have bled for Republican candidates in Virginia for decades.
So, I contacted the organizer of the ODBA and asked that I be removed from the list. I certainly didn’t want to. And my doing so is certainly not an indictment of the entire list. But there’s enough of that type of thing going on to make it unpleasant.
I’d still like to be a part of a group like the ODBA. I’m not sure I’d be welcomed back though.
I am fascinated by those rushing to the defense of the Dog’s role playing.Â
Just a few weeks ago we on the right were taking Jim Webb to task for his boorish behavior at a White House reception.Â
How can we condemn Webb’s rudeness and ignorance of protocol and at the same time condone the Dog’s playing dress up?
Sorry folks. I just can’t do it. I won’t do it.
If we’re to be the party of integrity, then we actually have to have some.
The Richmond Democrat is right when he says: This incident is further proof of the truth of that assertion. As things now stand, the ODBA’s credibility lies in shreds. It remains to be seen what they can do to restore their reputation.
So, I’m staying. But I’m staying under my rules. If that means Waldo wants to boot me from his list, so be it. If that means I’ll never again be a member of the ODBA, so be it.
I’ll no longer be a blogger who just regurgitates campaign press releases. I’ll take the information presented, and then tell you what I think.  Sometimes I’ll follow the party line. Sometimes I won’t.
But I’ll be able to sleep at night.Â
UPDATE: H/T to Kat at Cathouse Chat for An Unpleasant Duty and to I’m Not Emeril for My Last Word on Both Matters.
Their posts address the situation and the resolution. I have been welcomed back to the ODBA and have reinstated the list on my sidebar. It’s been an unpleasant few days, but I believe in the end we emerge stronger.